Joshua 22-24 songai Pathian thu part 4: Hnuataber Joshua thucah hnakte (Joshua 22 – 24)

Lai ngaantu: Henry T Conzo
date” 05^th January 2024

Thupi: Pathian thupiber dah in khua khang tlanghnak thute i.

Joshua 22 – 24 songai thupite

• I) Jordan ruuntii in nisuahlam umte vaihla hnak le Puleng tiang hnak thu (ch. 22)
  • A) Jordan ruuntii in nisuaklam umtute vaihla hnak thu (22.1-9)
  • B) Jordan ruuntii nisuaklam umtute in Puleng tiang hnak thu buai rel fiang dun hnak (22.10 – 34)
• II) Joshua in Israel mite hnuataber thucah hnakte (ch. 23 – 24)
  • A) Joshua in Israel mite hnenah Pathian rinsan hlen tuh in thu cah hnak (ch. 23)
  • B) Joshua le Israel mite Pathian rinsan hlen tuhin thu tiam bawn tlang hnak (24.1-28)
  • C) Joshua le suangbawi Eleazar thih hnak (24.29 – 33)

Summary: Israel mite ramte khai amahte covo tren zem dun ben hnua ah Joshua in Pathian rinsan tlang hlen tuhin thu cah hnakte i. Joshua chapter 22 – 24 heh a tlangpi thu in khanhnih in khan thil i. (I) Jordan ruuntii nisuak hnaklam umtu, Ruben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzahte kongcung i. Cen, (II) hnak tu, Joshua in Israel mite Pathian rinsan hlen tuuhin thu cahhnnak i. Ciami chapter 22 – 24 songai thute hmuahhmuah khaikhawm sioin hliakhlaih ilesingkhaw, “Pathian thupiber dah in nung tlang hnak, khua ruat in khuakhang tlang hnak” thute i.

(I) Pathian thupiber dah in khuakhang tlang:

Israel mite thuanthu, a hlaicein Canaan ram lang tlang hnak le ram a lang tlang hnak thute ngaihven ilesingkhaw, Jordan ruuntii in nisuaklam umtute, Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzahte thu heh tumce deuh in lar thah de i. Zalopehad fanute in ram co ngahve tuh heh tumce deuh in tawlrel tlang (Num. 27.1; Joshua 17.3-4). Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzahte in Jordan ruunti nisuahlam ramte heh ngen i (Num. 32.1-5). Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzahte in ciami ramte heh ngen ai co thil hnak thu heh Israel mite Egypt ram in nelrawn tan ai Canaan ram a hleng tian ngankhum hnak siongah fiah ngai in ngaan hnak umlo i. Hemi thu heh Number chapter 32 comment ngaan hnak songah semkhim deuh in ngaan hnak siar bet tu. Cen, Canaan ram a tawng thok tuh fangin khai Joshua in ciami, “Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzahte” ian heh sawm bangin um i (Joshua 1.10-18). Hetihai ciamite a sawm kherkher hnak heh amah, “Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzah” te in nikhum hnaklam ramte tawng nuam zelo in umtlang awng i ni maw? tiin, ruah hnak um thil i (Numbers chpater 32 comment ah siar bet tu).

(A) Canaan ramte a zemdun ben ai fangin khai ciami, “Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzah” te ian telh ai hmuifu pe in vaihla dun i (Joshua 22.1-9). Zaimanin hemi, “Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzah” miphun pathumte heh tumce deuh in ngaankhum i? tiheh, fiangin lingthilo khalselai, Pathian kihzah hnak thawn lungrual ngai in vaihla dun i.

(B) Cetihin, rem neu in hmuifu pe dun hnak thawn vaihla dun ben fangin Ciami, “Reuben, Gad, le Manasseh hin zaimawzah” te in Jordan ruuntii ham ah Puleng tiang tlang i. Ciamanin ruuntii nikhum hmunlam umtute in mawh hluk tlang i. Cetihai mawh a hlukdun tlanghnak thu heh phatak ngai in hliakhlaih ilesing khaw Pathian kihzah hnak, Pathian heh amahte thinlung veksen in iit tlang manin i, tiin ling thil ising. (i) Ruuntii nikhum hmunlam ai umtute in mawhhluk hnak thu hliakhlaih ilesingkhaw “Pathian thupiber in dah” manin mawh hluk hnak i (Joshua 22.16-20). (ii) Ruuntii nisuak hnaklam umtute ai Puleng a tiang tlang hnak thu hampi heh phatak ngai in hliakhlaih ve ilesingkhaw, Pathian thupiber ah dah” manin ciami Puleng tiang tlang hnak i, tiin, ling thil i. Amahte pong hnak thute siar ilesing khaw; (1) amahte – Ruuntii nisuak hnaklam umte – heh khatlamai umtu a unaute in, “kin miphun ilo i si, kin Pathian khai bialo isi” tiin, ti fangin a nung Pathian biatu miphun ihnak lar ruai tuhhnak tumtek hnak thawn Puleng tiang tlang i (Joshua 22.25). (2) Amahte heh Pathian bia miphun lar ruai hnak heh a tesinfate tian ban ling hlen tuh hnak tumtek hnak thawn Puleng tiang tlang i (Joshua 22.24). Amahte veksen ruah hnak thu thuuk deuh in ngaihven ilesingkhaw, Pathian thupiber dah in khua ruat tlang, khua khang tlang” hnak hmu thil i.

Zawthnak:

1) Pathian kihzah hnak heh kon tiin lar ruai pha nai aw sim? Zaitute i?

2) Na fate heh Christian ihnak ah zaibang i pa?

(II) Pathian hnen in pial tuhlo hnak thu heh thupiber dah tlang:

Joshua 22 – 24 songai a tlangpi thu pahnih hnak tu, Joshua in Israel mite heh Pathian rinsan hlen tuuhin thu cahhnnak thute i. Ciami a thu cuuk hnakte heh; (A) Pathian in ning hrangah a thukham khim ruai zo i, ciamanin, ning in khai Pathian zaangtaak awng mah ih” tihnak, le (B) Israel mite in khai Joshua hnenah, “Pathian ian ruaih tuh iing, ttin, thukham bawn tlang ve hnak” tiin, khan hnih in khan thil i.

(A) Joshua in Israel mite hnenah, “Pathian in a thu tiam hnakheh khim ruai liang zo i (Joshua 23:3-4, 14-15), ciamanin, ning – Israel mite – in khai Pathian heh zaangtaak mah ih, miphun dangte kom mahih, amahte pathian khai bia mahih, a thukham khimsio in ning bawttu a nung Pathian heh rinsan tu hlen ih” tiin, thu phatak neu in cuuk in zirh i (Joshua 23.5-6). Israel mipi konghoi tu Joshua in a konghoi hnak mipi heh amahte biahnak Pathian hnenin pial tuh heh zai tluk in lau sak, ti heh ling thil i (Joshua 23.5-16).

(B) Ciamanin, Joshua in Israel mite heh, “Pathian rinsan hlen ben peupeu tuh isi maw?” tiin, zawt trengtro i (Joshua 24:1-15, 19-20). Israel mite in khai, “a nung Pathian ruaih tuh hlen iing” tiin, thu kham bawn ve i (Joshua 24:21-24). Cetihin, ciami thukham kho tuh hnak hrang ah lung bir tlang i (Joshua 24:25-28).

Pathian thu sang in hlun tuh khai heh thinlung kho nai in hlun kul i. Pathian in Moses hnenah, “ning hlun ben tuhlo hnak thu kham dun mah ih” tiin, thu cuuk hnak um i (Levi 19.12). 

Hnikhnaih: Na Bawipa na Pathian heh na thinlung veksen, na ruahhnak veksen, na nunhnak vek in iit tu” (Mathai 22:37).

Zawthnak: Zaitu thupiber dan in khua ruat, khua khang, nung i si?