Lai ngaantu: Henry T Conzo
Date: 06^th January 2024

Thu hmaihoi

Main idea: Samson heh Pathian Rauhla in umpi manin hat roh khalselai, Filistin fenute manin a hnathnak le a huham siatsuah sak de i. Ikhalselai hnuataber ah Pathian Rauhla in umpi ai hat leh thotho i.

Thukhantute 13–16 songai thutlangpi:

• I) Samson te (မွေး) hnak thu (ch. 13).
• II) Samson Pathian Rauhla huham in umpi de khalselai, hnuataber ah hnawmral.
  • II.a) Timnah khua ai Filistin fenu, Samson, Filistin mite, le Judah mite thu (Judges 14-15).
  • II.b) Filistin fenu Delilah manin hnuataber ah Samson thi (ch. 16).

Thu tlangpi:

Pathian umpi hnak in Israel mite heh Canaan mite tawng neh i (Judges 1.1-26). Ikhalselai, Israel mite in Pathian thu pehnak hlun semkhimlo in a nehhnak Canaan mite heh hnawt siolo i (Judges 1.27-36). Ciamanin, Pathian in, Canaan mite hnawt tuh sio ing” tihnak thukham (Joshua 13.6; Exo. 23:20-33), heh khim ruai tum nawnlo i (Judges 2.3). Israel mite Canaan mite thawn komdun, hoidun tlang ai amahte biahnak khuavag khai bia tlang ve de i (Judges 3.6). Cetihin, Israel mite in Pathian bialo ai Pathian zaangtaak fangin, Pathian in a ralte neh ruai de ai harsa tuar ruai de i. Cen, Israel mite amahte ralte kut hnia ah harsa tuar fangin Pathian hnenah autlang leh de ai, Pathian in konghoitu ril in Israel mite heh amahte ral kut songin ao suak leh de i. Israel mite Pathian zaangtaak in sual trentro ai Pathian hnenah sual sir leh trengtro hnak thute heh Judges chapter 2 – 12 song ah siar thil i.

Thukhantute 13 – 16 songah Pathian in Samson heh te (မွေး) tuhin a nu le pa hnenah thu tiam i. Pathian Rauhla umpi hnak in Samson heh hat ngai i. Ikhalselai, Filistin fenu pahnih, – Timnah khua fenu nu le Delilah, Pathian in hnawt tusio ih tiin a tihnak miphun te – manin, Pathian Rauhla umpi mi samson vumah hnophnak hleng ai, hnuataber ah thihhnak tian tuar i. Ciami thute heh Judges 13 – 16 songah um i. Cetihin, Israel mite in Pathian konghoi hnak heh ling thiam tlanglo ai, amahte nuam dandan in laileng tlang i (ch. 17–21).

Thukhantute 13-16 songai Pathian thu:

I) Samson te hnak thu:

Cetihin, Israel mite in Pathian bialo ai Pathian zaangtaak fangin, Pathian in a ralte neh ruai de ai harsa tuar ruai de i. Cen, Israel mite amahte ralte kut hnia ah harsa tuar fangin Pathian hnenah autlang leh de ai, Pathian in konghoitu ril in Israel mite heh amahte ral kut songin ao suak leh de i (Judges 2-12). Ciabangin, Samson khai heh Pathian in ril hnak bangin ngai sung thil i. Ikhalselai, ahlan ai (ch 2-12 songai) “Israel aosuak tutuh konghoitu rilhnakte” thawn bang dun deuhlo i. Abang dunlo hnak thu heh phun hnih in hlir thil i.

(1) Israel mite hotu a ril fangin; (a) Pathian in, a vancungmi hlat in a daihhnak minung ril (b) Israel mite  amahte lal songin ril dunhnak heh Pathian in lungkhimpi / lingpi de i.

(2) Nu pum songah um tuh tian ban Pathian in hamthok in ril i. Samson te (မွေး) dan sik fangin Jesuh te ((မွေး) dan thawn bang dun i. Zaiman in bang dun i? ti ngawn ling fiang ngaingai thillo i.

Ahlanai hotute (Judges 2-12 songai hotute) le Samson rildan bang dunlo hnak thu heh, “zaitu tumtekhnak i?” ti heh, fiang io in rel hnak umlo i. Israel mite Pathian thupe hlun semkhimlo – Canaan mite hnawt sio tuh in pathian daih hnak bawnlo – ai, ciami a zuah hnak miphun te manin Pathian zaangtaak de i. Ciamanin, Pathian in cawh de ai amahte vumah hnawmhnak hleng de. Ikhalselai Pathian in aosuak sal leh de.

Caimanin, Israel mite Canaan mite kom manin, akom hnak amahte, a ralte kut ah a hleng de hnak heh lar ruai naum manin / ling ruai nuam in, pathian in, “Samson heh Filistine fenute pahnih manin a vumah hnawmhnak hleng ai hnuataber ah a mit phorh tian tuar hnak thu” (14.4) hmang i (ch. 13–16). Samson in Filistin fenu Timnah khua ai nupang ngelcel a daih hnak heh (Judges 14.3), Pathian in Filistin mite tawng tuhin tumtek hnak i (Judges 14.4). Ciamanin, Samson thuanthu he bangin in lang (interpret) singlai Pathian thu (theology) feh dan ah a phaber, a dikcangber, a nongber, tiin, ngai sung thil i. Samson thu hebangin hmudan ruatdan heh a semkhim deuh in ngaan bet vivo tuh ising.

Thupi deuh in ruat tuh pha:

Zaimanin Samson te? key verse Judges 14.4.

Zaimanin Pathian Rauhla huham in Samson umpi ai Samson hat?

Zaimanin Samson hnawmral de?

II) Samson Pathian Rauhla in huham in umpi de i. Ikhalselai hnuataber ah hnawm ral i

Israel mite Canaan mite kom manin, akom hnak amahte, a ralte kut ah a hleng de hnak heh lar ruai naum manin / ling ruai nuam in, pathian in, “Samson heh Filistine fenute pahnih hmang” ti mi thu, kin ruat tuh fangin, hmasaber ah Pathian in Canaan mite hnawt hnak sullam le tumtek hnak te in thok kul i. Cetihai Pathian tumtek hnak tu, (1) Canaan mite hua menma manin ilo ai Pathian amah heh ling fiang tlang tuhnak hrangah, i ai (2) Israel mite in amah Pathian linglotu, bialotu Canaan mite thawn kom dun in amah Pathian zaangtaak tuhhnak dailo manin hnawt ruai hnak ber i (hemi thu heh Judges chapter 1 comment hnak ah siar bet tu). Pathian in he tiin ti i, “Egypt ram in kaimah in ning ko ai, a tiamhnak ram – Canaan ram – ah ning hlen pi ing. [1] Thu ning tiam hnak bangin bawn sio ing. Ciamanin, ning in khai he ram – Canaan ram – ai umtute thawn thutiamhnak bawnlo in amahte pulengte heh bal sio tuh isi, tiin i tihnak thu heh hlun lo i si” ttin, Pathian in Israel mite mawh hluk (စွဲချက်တင်) awng i (Judges 2.1-3). Pathian in Canaan mite a hnawt ruai hnak tu Israel mite heh Canaan mite thawn kom dun fangin amah Pathian thawn pehzom dun hnak siatsuah tuh daihlo manin i. Pathian ruat hnak bang cekci in Israel mite heh Canaan mite thawn kondun, hoidun ai Canaan mite biahnak hlun in Pathian daihlo hnakber khuavang dang bia ngaingai i (Judges 3.6).

Caimanin, Israel mite Canaan mite kom manin, akom hnak amahte, a ralte kut ah a hleng de hnak heh lar ruai naum manin / ling ruai nuam in, pathian in, Samson heh Filistine fenute pahnih manin a vumah hnawmhnak hleng ai hnuataber ah a mit phorh tian tuar hnak thu hmang i” (ch. 13–16), tiin, rel (interpret) singlai Bible ai tumtek hnak thawn nongber tuh i tiin kin ti nuam hnak i. Hetihin kin lang (interpret) thil hnak tu; (1) Pathian in Israel mite ao suak tuh fangin a naruaihtu ril dan heh Samson ril dan le Thukhantute thuanthu (biblical histories) songai (Judges ch 2–12) rildan thawn bang dunlo (a cungai ngaan hnak ah siar bet tu), tihnak thu. (2) Cetihai, a bang dunlo tihnak heh Pathian in tumce deuh in tumtek (Judges 14:1-4) hnak manin i. Davis le Whitcomb [2] te ngaan hnak commantary songah Samson heh Pathian in tumce deuh in ril hlaice hnak tiin ngaan kom ve i. Cetihai Pathian tumtek hnak tu Filistin te siatsuah tuh nuam manin i, tiin ngaan i. Cen, Bible pong fang ah khai, “Filistin mite tawng tuhin caanpha si manin, Bawipa in Samson khiah he tin thil bawn ruai i” (Judges 14:4), tiin ngaan i. Bawipa in Samson khiah he tih in thil bawn ruai a ti nuam hnak tu, Samson in Filistin fenu daih ruai hnak thu rel i (Judges 14:1-4). “Pathian in Filistin mite tawng tuhin caanpha si” tiin ti i (v. 4). Samson thuanthu hliakhlaih deuh in sik ilesingkhaw, Pathian in Filistin mite tawng tuh hnak ian tumhnak ilo ai, Israel mite in khai, “Canaam mite kom manin tuar de” ti heh, ling fiah tuh in Samson heh a fenute manin hnawmral hnak ah hleng ruai de i. Samson a fenute manin hnawmral hnak ah a hleng hnuah ah khai sawngen fangin Pathian in ngai sak thotho de i. Thukhantute cauk songai Israel mite thuanthu heh Samson thuan thu in huap ngah sio i (a hlaice in Judges 2-12 karlak ai thute). Cetihai Pathian naper hnakte, Pathian iithnakte heh Israel mite in ling thiam cuanglo i. Uktu nailo, kilkhawltu nailo bangin amahte daihdaih in khuakhang in lai leng tlang de i. Cetihin Israel mite amahte daihdaih khuakhang in laileng tlang hnak thu heh Judges chapter 17-21 songah zir thil leh nga sing ih.

Thupi deuh in ruatphate:

1) Pathian in amah thawn pehzomhnak hnawmral tuh heh a daihlo hnak ber i.

2) Sualsiar fangin Pathian in kilkhawl leh de i.

3) A mahte zuah hnak minungte hmang in thu cuuk leh de i.

[1] Egypt ram in a kon lai ai Pathian pong hnak sik fang in a ko hnak san – a tumtek hnak – tu amah Pathian bia tuh hnak hrang ah ko awng hnak i (Exo. 5.1, 3).

[2] Davis, John J, and Whitcomb, John C., “Israel from Conquest to Exile: A Commentary on Joshua – 2 King”. (Barker Book House, 1970), 135-36.